Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in Nepal

I. Introduction to Foreign Arbitral Award Enforcement in Nepal

The enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Nepal is a critical aspect of international commercial arbitration, providing a mechanism for parties to enforce arbitration decisions across borders. Nepal, as a developing nation with increasing international trade and investment, has recognized the importance of having a robust framework for enforcing foreign arbitral awards. This process is governed by Nepalese law and international conventions to which Nepal is a party.

Nepal’s legal system, based on common law principles, provides a structured approach to the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. The country’s commitment to international arbitration is evident through its accession to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in 1998, which has significantly enhanced the enforceability of foreign awards within its jurisdiction.

II. Legal Framework for Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards

The primary legal framework for the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Nepal is established by the following:

1. The Arbitration Act, 2055 (1999)
2. The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1958
3. The Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer Act, 2075 (2019)
4. The Civil Code, 2074 (2017)

The Arbitration Act, 2055 (1999) is the cornerstone legislation governing arbitration in Nepal. Section 34 of this Act specifically deals with the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. It stipulates that a foreign arbitral award shall be enforced in the same manner as a judgment or order of a Nepalese court, provided it meets certain conditions.

Nepal’s accession to the New York Convention in 1998 marked a significant step towards aligning its arbitration practices with international standards. The convention provides a uniform set of rules for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, which Nepal has incorporated into its domestic legal framework.

III. Enforcement Process of Foreign Awards

The enforcement process of foreign arbitral awards in Nepal involves several steps, each governed by specific legal provisions:

A. Step 1: Application to court for enforcement

The process begins with the award creditor filing an application for enforcement with the High Court of Nepal. This application must be accompanied by the original award or a duly certified copy, the original arbitration agreement or a duly certified copy, and a certified Nepali translation if the award is not in Nepali or English.

B. Step 2: Court examination of award

Upon receiving the application, the High Court examines the award to ensure it meets the requirements set forth in Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 2055 (1999). This includes verifying that the award is not contrary to public policy in Nepal and that it does not involve a matter which cannot be settled by arbitration under Nepalese law.

C. Step 3: Notification to opposing party

If the court is satisfied that the award prima facie meets the enforcement requirements, it issues a notice to the opposing party, giving them an opportunity to present any objections to the enforcement.

D. Step 4: Hearing and decision

The court then conducts a hearing where both parties can present their arguments. After considering the submissions, the court decides whether to grant or refuse enforcement of the award.

E. Step 5: Execution of enforced award

If enforcement is granted, the award is treated as a judgment of a Nepalese court and can be executed accordingly. This may involve seizure of assets, attachment of bank accounts, or other measures to satisfy the award.

IV. Documents Required for Enforcement

To initiate the enforcement process, the following documents are typically required:

1. The original arbitral award or a duly certified copy
2. The original arbitration agreement or a duly certified copy
3. A certified Nepali translation of the award and agreement if not in Nepali or English
4. Proof of the award’s finality and enforceability in the country of origin
5. Power of attorney if the application is filed through a legal representative

V. Legal Services for Award Enforcement

Given the complexity of the enforcement process, parties often seek legal assistance. Nepalese law firms specializing in international arbitration and enforcement provide services including:

1. Preparing and filing enforcement applications
2. Representing parties in enforcement proceedings
3. Advising on potential challenges to enforcement
4. Assisting with the execution of enforced awards

VI. Typical Timeframe for Enforcement Process

The duration of the enforcement process can vary significantly depending on the complexity of the case and the court’s caseload. Generally, it may take anywhere from 6 months to 2 years to complete the enforcement process. Factors affecting the timeline include:

1. The completeness of the application and supporting documents
2. The nature and complexity of any objections raised
3. The court’s schedule and efficiency
4. Any appeals or challenges to the enforcement decision

Liquidation vs Bankruptcy in Nepal | Role of Shareholders in Company | Company Registration vs Trademark Registration

VII. Costs Associated with Enforcement

The costs of enforcing a foreign arbitral award in Nepal typically include:

1. Court fees for filing the enforcement application
2. Legal fees for representation in enforcement proceedings
3. Translation costs for documents not in Nepali or English
4. Expenses related to the execution of the award if enforcement is granted

The allocation of these costs is generally at the discretion of the court, although the losing party is often ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings.

VIII. Relevant Laws and Authorities

The key laws and authorities relevant to the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Nepal include:

1. The Arbitration Act, 2055 (1999)
2. The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1958
3. The Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer Act, 2075 (2019)
4. The Civil Code, 2074 (2017)
5. The High Court of Nepal
6. The Supreme Court of Nepal (for appeals)

IX. Enforcement Practices in Nepal

Nepal’s enforcement practices have evolved significantly since its accession to the New York Convention. The courts have generally shown a pro-enforcement bias, in line with international best practices. However, challenges remain, particularly in cases where enforcement is sought against government entities or where public policy considerations are invoked.

Some notable practices include:

1. Strict adherence to the grounds for refusal of enforcement as outlined in the New York Convention
2. A narrow interpretation of the public policy exception to enforcement
3. Increasing recognition of the principle of separability of the arbitration agreement
4. Growing judicial expertise in handling international arbitration matters

X. Conclusion

The enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Nepal has seen significant improvements in recent years, driven by legislative reforms and judicial developments. While challenges remain, the overall trend is towards a more arbitration-friendly environment. Parties seeking enforcement should be aware of the specific requirements and procedures under Nepalese law and consider engaging local legal expertise to navigate the process effectively.

FAQs:

1. Is Nepal a signatory to the New York Convention? Yes, Nepal acceded to the New York Convention on March 4, 1998, and it came into force on June 2, 1998.
2. Which court handles foreign award enforcement? The High Court of Nepal has jurisdiction over applications for the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.
3. What grounds exist for refusing enforcement? Grounds for refusal largely mirror those in the New York Convention, including incapacity of parties, invalidity of the arbitration agreement, lack of proper notice, awards beyond the scope of submission to arbitration, and violation of public policy.
4. How long does the enforcement process take? The enforcement process typically takes between 6 months to 2 years, depending on the complexity of the case and court efficiency.
5. Can partial enforcement be granted? Yes, Nepalese courts have the discretion to grant partial enforcement if only part of the award is enforceable under Nepalese law.
6. Are there time limits for seeking enforcement? The Arbitration Act, 2055 (1999) does not specify a time limit for seeking enforcement. However, general limitation periods under Nepalese law may apply.
7. Can enforcement decisions be appealed? Yes, decisions on enforcement can be appealed to the Supreme Court of Nepal within 35 days of the High Court’s decision.
8. How are enforcement costs allocated? Cost allocation is at the court’s discretion, but typically, the losing party bears the costs of the enforcement proceedings.
9. Can foreign awards be enforced against the government? In principle, foreign awards can be enforced against the government. However, enforcement against government assets may be subject to sovereign immunity considerations and specific procedural requirements.